In addition, some students suggested that theLaw School need to examine the institutions whichallowed the Frug parody to go to print.

"The faculty and administration should bedigging not just to get at the people but to getat the culture that produced this," said AndreaBrenneke, a third-year law student.

Dean of the Law School Robert C. Clarkdistributed a statement condemning the parody asan affront to "all standards of decency" an saidhe is still considering "what further steps may beappropriate."

The Revue piece, titled "He-Manifesto ofPost-Mortem Legal Feminist" and signed by "MayDoe, Rigor-Mortis Professor of Law," was intendedas a parody of an article by Frug printedposthumously in the Law review in March.

Frug's article, "A Postmodern feminist LegalManifesto," discussed legal theories on violenceagainst women. Some members of the LawReview opposed its publication at the time,and many students say the recent parody wasretaliation.

Several faculty members feel that disciplinaryaction should be considered against the studentsinvolved with the parody and some students havesuggested that the Revue editors docommunity service work at a battered women'sshelter.

Current Law Review President Emily R.Schulman '85 issued an apology on behalf of theorganization last week and canceled publication ofthe traditional spoof issue next year.

She also said the Law Review wouldestablish a committee to evaluate the treatment ofwomen within the organization