To the Editor:
Having received a ballot for the election of new Overseers for Harvard University, I note that five nominees ("by petition") are running under the banner of "Free Harvard, Fair Harvard." I am disappointed to see that only two of them graduated from Harvard College, and two of them graduated from Harvard Law School. And yet the free tuition they espouse appears to be directed at the College; I can't imagine they are campaigning for free tuition to the Law School.
And yet they act as if the entire endowment is available for tuition at Harvard College. Such a false argument may be more applicable to Princeton, from which two of them graduated and which, I understand, has the highest ratio of endowment funds to undergraduates.
I am also disappointed to see that one of the petition candidates characterizes Harvard University as "a tax-exempt hedge fund." Most of us assume that Harvard's tax-exempt status is related to education. But I suppose, if one is a hammer, everything else looks like a nail.
John Silver graduated from Harvard College in 1967.
Read more in Opinion
Letter to the Editor: Divestment is not HypocrisyRecommended Articles
-
England Lacrosse CaptainAt a meeting of the Varsity Lacrosse team yesterday afternoon Jonathan Seiferth England '35 of Pittsfield, was elected captain. England
-
Better Uses of Harvard's WealthAs the soon-to-be interim president of Harvard, Derek C. Bok leads an institution far wealthier than it was 15 years
-
The Big Catch of Rising TuitionThere are underlying problems with raising tuition for which financial aid cannot compensate.
-
Don’t Eradicate TuitionPut simply, free tuition would provide an unnecessary subsidy to students whose families who can afford to pay for college.
-
Better Understanding Harvard’s Finances
