Advertisement

‘The Year’?—Hockey Season in Review

WORCESTER, Mass.—‘The Year’ should end with a game-winner in overtime, gloves and sticks on victorious flights through the air and coaches wearing loafers trying like heck not to slip on the ice as they make their way out for the celebration.

This year was supposed to be ‘The Year’ for the Harvard men’s hockey team.

But ‘The Year’ isn’t supposed to end with the captain’s eyes red from tears, one of the team’s key players wearing street clothes before the end of the game after a questionable penalty and a coach saying he didn’t see the “defensive intensity” his team needed to have in its biggest game of the season.

“Our goal was to make the Frozen Four,” Crimson captain Dominic Moore said softly after his career ended with a 6-4 loss to Boston University at the NCAA Northeast Regional on Friday afternoon. “And that didn’t happen.”

Which was disappointing, because Harvard seemed so capable of getting there. It had as many NHL draft picks (13) as any team in the nation, arguably the best player on the ice in each of its games during the later half of the season (Moore), a playoff-tested goaltender (sophomore Dov Grumet-Morris), and the invaluable experience of nearly beating the eventual NCAA runner-up during the first round of last season’s tournament.

Advertisement

But even with all of that, the Crimson finished this season without any trophies. It came oh-so-close last weekend, when it led Cornell, 2-1, in the ECAC championship game. The Big Red scored with a little over 30 seconds left to force overtime, and won soon thereafter.

Then there was Friday’s game with BU, a bummer of an ending to what was otherwise a very good season.

Harvard won 22 games, its most since 1994, and made back-to-back NCAA tournament appearances for the first time in nearly a decade. The Crimson avoided the post-exam slump that marred last year’s regular season, establishing second-half consistency in its stead. Harvard began the season No. 14 in both major polls and finished at No. 11, staying ranked every week but two.

In college hockey, though, success isn’t measured by rankings and regular-season wins. Once programs reach the level where they are expected to consistently play in the NCAA tournament, entire seasons are often judged—fairly or unfairly—on how they perform at this time of year, with little consideration given to what happened in the prior six months.

Harvard has reached that level. Coach Mark Mazzoleni, his staff and his players—to their credit—are talented enough and have achieved enough during the past two seasons to merit having their big expectations begin in March and end in April.

As Moore said numerous times during the season, the team’s goal was to reach the Frozen Four. Regardless of the fact that the Crimson was technically an underdog in Worcester, it was very reasonable for Moore and his teammates to expect that they would realize that objective.

Instead, Harvard’s season ended in frustration. It allowed more goals against BU than it had in any other game this year, and took 10 penalties for 39 minutes.

Included on that rap sheet was an iffy five-minute butt-ending call and ten-minute game disqualification on sophomore defenseman Ryan Lannon that left the Crimson with only five defensemen for the final two periods.

Lannon’s penalty was critical. In addition to taking Harvard’s best defensive blue liner out of the game, it gave the Terriers nearly five minutes on the power play to begin the second. And while BU didn’t score, having to kill such a long penalty took a physical toll on some of the Crimson’s key players—which could have played a role in BU’s game-changing three-goal burst early in the third.

There’s never an easy way to reshuffle defensive pairings with a man out, but having to do so seemed to rattle Harvard a little more than it should have. The Crimson was disorganized in the defensive zone, and the solid-yet-unspectacular Terriers made it pay.

Recommended Articles

Advertisement