Morality Debate Won't Lead to Consensus
To the editors:
In "Questioning Homosexuality" (Opinion, March 13), Stephen E. Sachs '02 claims that the morality debate over homosexuality is far from settled and must be engaged before a "consensus" can be reached on issues like same-sex marriage.
To borrow Andrew Sullivan's argument, the institution of marriage is utterly uninterested in the question of morality or character. Death-row criminals, immigrants held for deportation, the mentally-retarded, dead-beat fathers, even the "rapists" with whom Sachs compares homosexuals all have a legal right to marry in this country. Sachs is right to note that there is not a national consensus on homosexual rights. But morality, as the issue of same-sex marriage shows, is not the starting-point for such a debate.
Adam Christian '01
March 13, 2001
Read more in Opinion
Bad Jobs at HarvardRecommended Articles
-
Contextualizing 'Clit Notes'To the editors: While I admire the candor of Noah D. Oppenheim '00 (Column, Apr. 3) regarding his moral issues
-
Questioning HomosexualityA recent issue of the magazine Flare entitled its cover story "Moving Beyond the Morality Debate." Unfortunately, the series of
-
The Virtues of AmbivalenceA fter Professor Harvey C. Mansfield called gay love "shameful" and inherently "imperfect and stunted and frustrated," the Bisexual, Gay
-
Prof Discusses Morality’s Genetic Roots -
Of Morals And Magnets -
Panelists Talk Science, EthicsMixing DNA and Descartes, the panel discussed how developments in evolutionary biology and the mind sciences should be applied to law, philosophy, and economics.
