To the Editors of The Crimson:
Rich Meislin's August 7th article on the Black Rock Forest omits an important phrase when he quotes me as saying I have found no data to support the contention that acreage Con Ed needs "is in any way essential to the forest..." What I said is that I have no information indicating that the acreage in question "is in any way essential to research at the forest..." Daniel Steiner General Counsel
Advertisement
Want to keep up with breaking news?
Subscribe to our email newsletter.
Read more in News
Counseling Groups Form Committee, Prepare NewsletterRecommended Articles
-
Storm King Opposition GrowsEarly this week, members of Harvard Ecology Action and the Ad Hoc Committee to Save Black Rock Forest collected over
-
Con Ed's Fall Deadline Forces Harvard's Decisionannouncement of the Storm King project. In a letter to The New York Times, Pusey stated that he and the
-
Ecology Group to Hold Forum On Black Rock Forest ReportThe Harvard Ecology Action group last night voted to sponsor a forum concerning Black Rock Forest, a part of which
-
Report Advises Land Sale to Con EdA special committee has recommended to President Bok that the University take no active steps to prevent construction of a
-
Bad Day For Black RockT HE SPECIAL COMMITTEE REPORT on Black Rock Forest is unacceptable not only for its bizarre self-contradictions but also for
-
Con Ed Threatens Harvard ForestBad Day at Black Rock The Federal Power Commission is now reconsidering Consolidated Edison Company's eight-year-old request to take over
